D angerous:
“the fountainhead of all false biblical interpretation and of all heresy is invariably the isolation and the absolutising of one single passage.” (Oscar Cullmann, The State in the New Testament, 47).
It is therefore
better to drop the 'about' part of the question when approaching the Bible and
simply ask: What does the Bible say? This is not easy, because our heads burst
with questions and our conflicts crave a judge's hammer that will easily settle
arguments, preferably in our favor of course.. Let me illustrate the
difference:
'Biblical
giving':
A few years
ago, I heard a preacher give a powerful sermon on giving. He preached about the
widow who gave her last two copper coins (Mark.12:41-44) in such a compelling
way that at the end of his sermon people were flooding to the front of the
church to empty their wallets. Ironically most of the money probably paid for
the preachers plain-ticket to the Bahamas. I have also noticed that it is
usually not the widows who preach from this passage. The sermon that resulted from this passage was
the result of asking the question:"What does the Bible say about giving in
church?"What is the result when one approaches the same passage not with the question:"What does the Bible say about giving?" but rather with the question "What does the Bible say?" or in this case, what is the author of the gospel trying to say with this passage. The passage gets a whole new meaning. Let us look at the broader context of this passage.
The
incident with the widow occurs at the end of a series of conflicts between
Jesus and the religious leaders in Jerusalem (Mark. 11:27-12:40) and right
before the words of Jesus about the destruction of the temple (Mark. 13). Actually the tension between Jesus and the temple already comes to the surface after His entry into Jerusalem (Mark. 11:1-26). Just
preceding the incident where this old widow comes to give her copper coins, the
author relates that Jesus said:
"Beware of the scribes, who like to walk around in long robes and like greetings in the marketplaces and have the best seats in the synagogues and the places of honor at feasts, who devour widows' houses and for a pretense make long prayers. They will receive the greater condemnation." (Mar 12:38-40)
This widow giving her last coins illustrated the failure of the temple and it's leaders to do what was just. A closer reading of Mark 11:1-26 reveals how the story of the cursed fig tree is intertwined with the cleansing of the temple and the eventual destruction of it. The story of the exploited widow giving her last coins is a most concrete example of the bad fruit of the temple system in the time of Jesus. All of this is simply not seen when someone read the passage of the widow in isolation as an answer the question: "What does the Bible say about giving?".
When read as part of the carefully composed gospel of Mark, asking what the author is trying to say, the passage of the widow giving her coins is not in the first place about giving, but an tale about God taking the side of those who are exploited by religious leaders. What happened however is that this preacher in his expensive suit already knew what he wanted to say about giving. All he needed was a text to give it a legitimate basis. He found his text and he got his money, sadly ignoring the bigger warning the whole passage had in store for him and others like him.
A similar thing happens when people in the debate about "What the Bible says about homosexuality?" usually read Romans 1:24-32 and fail to see how the passage is part of a whole letter, with an agenda they themselves often ignore: equality before God and the unity of the church. Perhaps when I have time, I will write more about that. For now it is sufficient to say. Don't ask what Paul says about homosexuality in Romans. Simply ask:"What was Paul trying to say?" Taking seriously what Paul is trying to say in the whole letter should keep us busy for a while.